Comparison of ghosting effects for three commercial a-Si EPIDs.

Marcel Van Herk, L N McDermott, S M J J G Nijsten, J-J Sonke, M Partridge, M van Herk, B J Mijnheer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Many studies have reported dosimetric characteristics of amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). Some studies ascribed a non-linear signal to gain ghosting and image lag. Other reports, however, state the effect is negligible. This study compares the signal-to-monitor unit (MU) ratio for three different brands of EPID systems. The signal was measured for a wide range of monitor units (5-1000), dose-rates, and beam energies. All EPIDs exhibited a relative under-response for beams of few MUs; giving 4 to 10% lower signal-to-MU ratios relative to that of 1000 MUs. This under-response is consistent with ghosting effects due to charge trapping.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalMedical Physics
    Volume33
    Issue number7
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ghosting effects for three commercial a-Si EPIDs.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this