Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software

Simon French; Dong-Ling Xu

doi:10.1002/mcda.372

Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software

Simon French, Dong-Ling Xu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the functionality and interfaces of five MCDM software packages. We recognize that no single package is appropriate for all decision contexts and processes. Thus our emphasis is not so much to compare the functionality of the packages per se, but to consider their fit with different decision making processes. In doing so, we hope to provide potential users with guidance on selecting a package that is more compatible with their needs. Moreover, we reflect on the further functionality which we would believe should be developed and included in MCDM packages. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	65-80
Number of pages	16
Journal	Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Volume	13
Issue number	2-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.372
Publication status	Published - 2005

Access to Document

10.1002/mcda.372

Cite this

@article{ef12d86bc79d47dcb00150a7ea7fd39e,

title = "Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software",

abstract = "In this paper, we discuss the functionality and interfaces of five MCDM software packages. We recognize that no single package is appropriate for all decision contexts and processes. Thus our emphasis is not so much to compare the functionality of the packages per se, but to consider their fit with different decision making processes. In doing so, we hope to provide potential users with guidance on selecting a package that is more compatible with their needs. Moreover, we reflect on the further functionality which we would believe should be developed and included in MCDM packages. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",

author = "Simon French and Dong-Ling Xu",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1002/mcda.372",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "65--80",

journal = "Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",

issn = "1099-1360",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software

AU - French, Simon

AU - Xu, Dong-Ling

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In this paper, we discuss the functionality and interfaces of five MCDM software packages. We recognize that no single package is appropriate for all decision contexts and processes. Thus our emphasis is not so much to compare the functionality of the packages per se, but to consider their fit with different decision making processes. In doing so, we hope to provide potential users with guidance on selecting a package that is more compatible with their needs. Moreover, we reflect on the further functionality which we would believe should be developed and included in MCDM packages. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - In this paper, we discuss the functionality and interfaces of five MCDM software packages. We recognize that no single package is appropriate for all decision contexts and processes. Thus our emphasis is not so much to compare the functionality of the packages per se, but to consider their fit with different decision making processes. In doing so, we hope to provide potential users with guidance on selecting a package that is more compatible with their needs. Moreover, we reflect on the further functionality which we would believe should be developed and included in MCDM packages. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/mcda.372

DO - 10.1002/mcda.372

M3 - Article

SN - 1099-1360

VL - 13

SP - 65

EP - 80

JO - Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

JF - Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

IS - 2-3

ER -

Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this