Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)

M. Betancourt; S. Bolognesi; J. Calcutt; R. Castillo Fernandez; A. Cudd; S. Dytman; B. Eberly; A.p. Furmanski; R. Fine; J. Grange; L. Jiang; T. Katori; J. Kleckner; J. Kleykamp; K. Mahn; B. Messerly; G. Perdue; L. Pickering; J.p. Stowell; J. Sobczyk; N. Suarez; H. Tanaka; R. Tayloe; R.t. Thornton; M. Wilking; C. Wilkinson; C. Wret; G.p. Zeller

doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)

M. Betancourt, S. Bolognesi, J. Calcutt, R. Castillo Fernandez, A. Cudd, S. Dytman, B. Eberly, A.p. Furmanski, R. Fine, J. Grange, L. Jiang, T. Katori, J. Kleckner, J. Kleykamp, K. Mahn, B. Messerly, G. Perdue, L. Pickering, J.p. Stowell, J. SobczykN. Suarez, H. Tanaka, R. Tayloe, R.t. Thornton, M. Wilking, C. Wilkinson, C. Wret, G.p. Zeller

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.

Original language	English
Journal	Physics Reports
Early online date	3 Sept 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

tensions-physrept-aug18Accepted author manuscript, 1.01 MB

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0370157318302175

Cite this

Betancourt, M., Bolognesi, S., Calcutt, J., Castillo Fernandez, R., Cudd, A., Dytman, S., Eberly, B., Furmanski, A. P., Fine, R., Grange, J., Jiang, L., Katori, T., Kleckner, J., Kleykamp, J., Mahn, K., Messerly, B., Perdue, G., Pickering, L., Stowell, J. P., ... Zeller, G. P. (2018). Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report). Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

@article{bfad1812d26d42dcae76ca20e2030b80,

title = "Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)",

abstract = "Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.",

author = "M. Betancourt and S. Bolognesi and J. Calcutt and {Castillo Fernandez}, R. and A. Cudd and S. Dytman and B. Eberly and A.p. Furmanski and R. Fine and J. Grange and L. Jiang and T. Katori and J. Kleckner and J. Kleykamp and K. Mahn and B. Messerly and G. Perdue and L. Pickering and J.p. Stowell and J. Sobczyk and N. Suarez and H. Tanaka and R. Tayloe and R.t. Thornton and M. Wilking and C. Wilkinson and C. Wret and G.p. Zeller",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003",

language = "English",

journal = "Physics Reports",

issn = "0370-1573",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Betancourt, M, Bolognesi, S, Calcutt, J, Castillo Fernandez, R, Cudd, A, Dytman, S, Eberly, B, Furmanski, AP, Fine, R, Grange, J, Jiang, L, Katori, T, Kleckner, J, Kleykamp, J, Mahn, K, Messerly, B, Perdue, G, Pickering, L, Stowell, JP, Sobczyk, J, Suarez, N, Tanaka, H, Tayloe, R, Thornton, RT, Wilking, M, Wilkinson, C, Wret, C & Zeller, GP 2018, 'Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)', Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)

AU - Betancourt, M.

AU - Bolognesi, S.

AU - Calcutt, J.

AU - Castillo Fernandez, R.

AU - Cudd, A.

AU - Dytman, S.

AU - Eberly, B.

AU - Furmanski, A.p.

AU - Fine, R.

AU - Grange, J.

AU - Jiang, L.

AU - Katori, T.

AU - Kleckner, J.

AU - Kleykamp, J.

AU - Mahn, K.

AU - Messerly, B.

AU - Perdue, G.

AU - Pickering, L.

AU - Stowell, J.p.

AU - Sobczyk, J.

AU - Suarez, N.

AU - Tanaka, H.

AU - Tayloe, R.

AU - Thornton, R.t.

AU - Wilking, M.

AU - Wilkinson, C.

AU - Wret, C.

AU - Zeller, G.p.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.

AB - Over the last decade, there has been enormous effort to measure neutrino interaction cross sections important to oscillation experiments. However, a number of results from modern experiments appear to be in tension with each other, despite purporting to measure the same processes. The TENSIONS2016 workshop was held at University of Pittsburgh July 24–31, 2016 and was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astronomy, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC). The focus was on bringing experts from three experimental collaborations together to compare results in detail and try to find the source of tension by clarifying and comparing signal definitions and the analysis strategies used for each measurement. A set of comparisons between the measurements using a consistent set of models was also made. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of that work.

U2 - 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.08.003

M3 - Article

SN - 0370-1573

JO - Physics Reports

JF - Physics Reports

ER -

Comparisons and challenges of modern neutrino scattering experiments (TENSIONS2016 report)

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this