Abstract
This paper re-examines the instrumental variable (IV) approach to estimating returns to education by use of compulsory school law (CSL) in the US. We show that the IV-approach amounts to a change in model specification by changing the causal status of the variable of interest. From this perspective, the IV-OLS (ordinary least square) choice becomes a model selection issue between non-nested models and is hence testable using cross validation methods. It also enables us to unravel several logic flaws in the conceptualisation of IV-based models. Using the causal chain model specification approach, we overcome these flaws by carefully distinguishing returns to education from the treatment effect of CSL. We find relatively robust estimates for the first effect, while estimates for the second effect are hindered by measurement errors in the CSL indicators. We find reassurance of our approach from fundamental theories in statistical learning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 36 |
Journal | Econometrics |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- Average return to education
- Instrumental variables
- Randomisation
- Research design
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Global Development Institute