Compulsory schooling and returns to education: A re-examination

Sophie van Huellen*, Duo Qin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper re-examines the instrumental variable (IV) approach to estimating returns to education by use of compulsory school law (CSL) in the US. We show that the IV-approach amounts to a change in model specification by changing the causal status of the variable of interest. From this perspective, the IV-OLS (ordinary least square) choice becomes a model selection issue between non-nested models and is hence testable using cross validation methods. It also enables us to unravel several logic flaws in the conceptualisation of IV-based models. Using the causal chain model specification approach, we overcome these flaws by carefully distinguishing returns to education from the treatment effect of CSL. We find relatively robust estimates for the first effect, while estimates for the second effect are hindered by measurement errors in the CSL indicators. We find reassurance of our approach from fundamental theories in statistical learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number36
JournalEconometrics
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

Keywords

  • Average return to education
  • Instrumental variables
  • Randomisation
  • Research design

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compulsory schooling and returns to education: A re-examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this