Conceptual approaches to the study of 'national' traditions in criminology

Bill Hebenton, Susyan Jou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite increasing awareness of the decisive role of social determinants, or 'particularising forces' to use Neil Smelser's vivid term, on the development of criminology in a given national context, there is no widely accepted conceptual framework for their investigation. The literature on national 'criminologies' has increased substantially over the last decade; arguably this is a key task given criminology's particular 'contingent' presence as a modern social science. The study of its development in different 'national contexts', therefore, becomes all the more relevant to our understanding. However, it is also evident that existing studies make little explicit use of frameworks of analysis. This paper reviews six heuristic frameworks drawn from the literatures of 'science studies' and the sociology of knowledge; it also illustrates with examples from criminology. We argue that there is now a need for those researching 'national' criminologies to be much more explicit about the conceptual framework(s) utilized. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-130
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptual approaches to the study of 'national' traditions in criminology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this