Conceptualising and Measuring Adolescents’ Hedonic and Eudemonic Wellbeing: Discriminant Validity and Dimensionality Concerns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There is a gap between the theoretical assumptions of wellbeing and its associated empirical constructs. Three measurement models (a correlated factors model, a second-order two-factor model, and a bifactor model) were analysed using a large sample of English adolescents (n = 37, 630) to test whether the theoretical separation between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing is empirically supported, and whether there is the possibility of essential unidimensionality. Evidence of a general factor of wellbeing was found in the bifactor model, challenging the de-facto distinction often made between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-579
Number of pages29
JournalChild Indicators Research
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date8 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Bifactor model
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis
  • Eudemonic wellbeing
  • Hedonic wellbeing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualising and Measuring Adolescents’ Hedonic and Eudemonic Wellbeing: Discriminant Validity and Dimensionality Concerns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this