Cone contrasts do not predict color constancy

I. J. Murray, A. Daugirdiene, R. Stanikunas, H. Vaitkevicius, J. J. Kulikowski

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    A successive, asymmetric color-matching paradigm was used to investigate the link between cone contrast and the stability of perceived colors. We measured the perceived color shifts of 10 Munsell samples, induced by test illuminant A, simulated in u′v′ color space. The capacity of the visual system to resist these shifts, otherwise known as color constancy, is measured in terms of the Brunswik ratio, BR. Cone contrasts are calculated with respect to either the physical or perceived background. Subjective cone contrasts show a better fit to the von Kries law than those based on the physical background. Complete cone adaptation occurs when color constancy is high. However we show conditions where cone adaptation seems complete but color constancy is poor. Copyright © 2006 Cambridge University Press.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)543-547
    Number of pages4
    JournalVisual Neuroscience
    Volume23
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2006

    Keywords

    • Color appearance
    • Color constancy
    • Cone contrast
    • Physical background
    • Von Kries law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cone contrasts do not predict color constancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this