Abstract
The literature suggests that maturity assessment tools could be successful if based on process capabilities which are the outcomes of critical success factors and barriers to a process. This paper investigate the configuration management process capabilities finalized on the basis of semi-structured interviews with configuration management professionals and analysis of two highly significant studies in the development of configuration management as a researchable topic. The first study investigated the critical success factors for the successful CM development [1] while the other study looked at the identification of barriers to effective CM deployment [2]. The literature suggests that majority of research studies have focussed on the process capability itself, not the success or failure of CM. A list of ten process capabilities are finalized which will provide the necessary foundation to devise and measure a configuration management maturity model.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 169-172 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Procedia CIRP |
Volume | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | 2nd International Through-Life Engineering Services Conference, TESConf 2013 - Cranfield, United Kingdom Duration: 5 Nov 2013 → 6 Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Barriers
- Configuration management
- Critical success factors
- Maturity model
- Process improvements