Connecting Events in Time to Identify a Hidden Population: Birth Mothers and Their Children in Recurrent Care Proceedings in England

K Broadhurst, B Alrouh, E Yeend, J Harwin, M Shaw, M Pilling, C Mason, S Kershaw

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There is international concern about the population of birth mothers who experience repeat court-ordered removal of children. This article reports the findings from a population profiling study that provides the first picture of the scale of women's repeat involvement in public law proceedings in England. Based on national records from the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) (n = 43,541 birth mothers, 2007-14), two subsets of mother, child and legal proceedings data were created. The aims of the study were to:(i) produce a descriptive profile of recurrent cases, (ii) estimate the probability and timing of recurrence and (iii) examine the relationship between maternal age and recurrence. Quantitative analysis comprised descriptive statistics for profiling purposes and methods of survival analysis to estimate probabilities. Findings indicate that the family justice system recycles a sizeable percentage of women (24 per cent) through repeat episodes of care proceedings, with young women aged sixteen to nineteen years most at risk of recurrence. Implications for social workers and the family courts are outlined with reference to new innovations in England.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2241-2260
    Number of pages19
    JournalThe British Journal of Social Work
    Volume45
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2015

    Keywords

    • Care proceedings
    • Recurrence
    • Birth mothers
    • Longitudinal

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting Events in Time to Identify a Hidden Population: Birth Mothers and Their Children in Recurrent Care Proceedings in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this