TY - JOUR
T1 - Consistency and consensus reaching process for group decision making based on complete interval distributed preference relations under social network analysis
AU - Zhou, Mi
AU - Guan, Zhong-Xu
AU - Zhou, Zhi-Ping
AU - Wu, Jian
AU - Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
A2 - Chen, Yu-Wang
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Grant No.72071056, 72101077, 71571166 and 71971135, NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization under the Grant No.U1709215, Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Grant No.71521001, the grant (No. PID2019-103880RB-I00) from the Spanish State Research Agency, and the grant (No. P2000673) from the Andalusian Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Group decision-making (GDM) problems often consist of many indeterminacy factors in realistic situation. How to cope with consistency and consensus under uncertain circumstance are two critical issues in pairwise comparison based GDM problems. In this paper, we firstly propose the model of complete interval distributed preference relation (CIDPR) based on the concept of linguistic distribution with interval symbolic proportions, distribution linguistic preference relation (DLPR) and IDPR. Secondly, the additive consistency index of CIDPR is defined to measure the consistency level of expert’s judgment, and an adjustment algorithm is proposed for converting inconsistent CIDPR to an acceptable consistent level. Thirdly, since trust relation is a critical factor in the generation of experts’ weights and the adjustment of experts’ opinions, consensus reaching process (CRP) is designed to take into account distributed linguistic trust relations under social network analysis (SNA). In the proposed adjustment mechanism, non-consensus individual should modify opinion towards his/her trusted and highly weighted expert. The advantage of the proposed inconsistent CIDPR adjustment model can maximally retain the information in the original distribution, while the CRP has a relatively fast convergent speed and good practicality. An illustrative example of strategic new product selection is conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method and its potential in supporting realistic GDM problems.
AB - Group decision-making (GDM) problems often consist of many indeterminacy factors in realistic situation. How to cope with consistency and consensus under uncertain circumstance are two critical issues in pairwise comparison based GDM problems. In this paper, we firstly propose the model of complete interval distributed preference relation (CIDPR) based on the concept of linguistic distribution with interval symbolic proportions, distribution linguistic preference relation (DLPR) and IDPR. Secondly, the additive consistency index of CIDPR is defined to measure the consistency level of expert’s judgment, and an adjustment algorithm is proposed for converting inconsistent CIDPR to an acceptable consistent level. Thirdly, since trust relation is a critical factor in the generation of experts’ weights and the adjustment of experts’ opinions, consensus reaching process (CRP) is designed to take into account distributed linguistic trust relations under social network analysis (SNA). In the proposed adjustment mechanism, non-consensus individual should modify opinion towards his/her trusted and highly weighted expert. The advantage of the proposed inconsistent CIDPR adjustment model can maximally retain the information in the original distribution, while the CRP has a relatively fast convergent speed and good practicality. An illustrative example of strategic new product selection is conducted to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method and its potential in supporting realistic GDM problems.
KW - Complete interval distributed preference relation
KW - Consensus reaching process
KW - Consistency
KW - Distributed linguistic trust relation
KW - Group decision making
KW - Opinion fusion
U2 - 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.015
DO - 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.015
M3 - Article
VL - 88
SP - 126
EP - 145
JO - Information Fusion
JF - Information Fusion
SN - 1566-2535
ER -