TY - JOUR
T1 - Contacting gamete donors to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child
T2 - What are the rights and obligations of gamete donors in these cases? A response to Horton et al
AU - Frith, Lucy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - In their paper Horton et al argue that it is acceptable to contact an anonymous egg-donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor conceived child, despite the donor, 'indicating on a historical consent form that she did not wish to take part in future research, and that she did not wish to be informed if she was found to be a carrier of a "harmful inherited condition"'. There are a number of claims embedded in Horton et al's position that it is acceptable to contact the donor and request that she at least think about participating in genetic testing. In this response. I will go through their main claims and argue that the area of genomic medicine does not justify exceptions to general consent conditions as the authors suppose and conclude that the donor should not be contacted. I will then go on to suggest a policy change that would address Horton et al's concerns but would not involve over-riding any previously expressed wishes.
AB - In their paper Horton et al argue that it is acceptable to contact an anonymous egg-donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor conceived child, despite the donor, 'indicating on a historical consent form that she did not wish to take part in future research, and that she did not wish to be informed if she was found to be a carrier of a "harmful inherited condition"'. There are a number of claims embedded in Horton et al's position that it is acceptable to contact the donor and request that she at least think about participating in genetic testing. In this response. I will go through their main claims and argue that the area of genomic medicine does not justify exceptions to general consent conditions as the authors suppose and conclude that the donor should not be contacted. I will then go on to suggest a policy change that would address Horton et al's concerns but would not involve over-riding any previously expressed wishes.
KW - genetic information
KW - genetic screening/testing
KW - informed consent
KW - reproductive medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072037642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105629
DO - 10.1136/medethics-2019-105629
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31481473
AN - SCOPUS:85072037642
VL - 46
SP - 220
EP - 222
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
SN - 0306-6800
IS - 3
ER -