TY - JOUR
T1 - Contesting feminist power Europe
T2 - is Feminist Foreign Policy possible for the EU?
AU - Guerrina, Roberta
AU - Haastrup, Toni
AU - Wright, Katharine A.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper has been in the making for the last ten years. We have many people to thank for pushing us to develop our framework and thinking on this topic. We would like to thank in particular the UACES Gendering EU Studies Collaborative Research Network for giving us the space to present early articulations of the concepts developed in this paper. These ideas ultimately culminated in the European Commission funded 2018 Summer School on “Feminist Power Europe? Capacity Building, Strategies and Methodologies for a European Feminist Foreign Policy”. Most of all, we would like to thank the editors of this special issue for their feedback and for pushing us to make our argument tighter and more precise. As ever mistakes are all ours.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023/8/24
Y1 - 2023/8/24
N2 - Since 2014, several European Union (EU) member states have adopted their own versions of “Feminist Foreign Policy” (FFP). Increasingly, feminist bureaucrats, politicians, activists and scholars are calling for the EU to do the same. This article scrutinises claims to the feminist actorsness of the EU by introducing the analytical concept of Feminist Power Europe (FPE). In employing FPE the article examines whether the EU can adopt a FFP that upholds transformative potential of feminism. Undertaking critical content analysis of key documents, we identify three overarching feminist frames that emerge in the EU’s external policies: (1) Liberal; (2) Intersectional; (3) Postcolonial. We demonstrate that the EU’s propensity for a transformative feminist foreign policy is limited by the setup of global politics and the main drivers of European integration, which continue to be situated in a traditionally masculine environment and are defined by prevailing hierarchies. In undertaking this work, we highlight the constraints of advocating for the EU to adopt a FFP. This paper concludes by cautioning against the uncritical deployment of “feminism” in foreign policy articulation within an FPE configuration that excludes reflexivity about the EU’s external relations vision and indeed, its practice.
AB - Since 2014, several European Union (EU) member states have adopted their own versions of “Feminist Foreign Policy” (FFP). Increasingly, feminist bureaucrats, politicians, activists and scholars are calling for the EU to do the same. This article scrutinises claims to the feminist actorsness of the EU by introducing the analytical concept of Feminist Power Europe (FPE). In employing FPE the article examines whether the EU can adopt a FFP that upholds transformative potential of feminism. Undertaking critical content analysis of key documents, we identify three overarching feminist frames that emerge in the EU’s external policies: (1) Liberal; (2) Intersectional; (3) Postcolonial. We demonstrate that the EU’s propensity for a transformative feminist foreign policy is limited by the setup of global politics and the main drivers of European integration, which continue to be situated in a traditionally masculine environment and are defined by prevailing hierarchies. In undertaking this work, we highlight the constraints of advocating for the EU to adopt a FFP. This paper concludes by cautioning against the uncritical deployment of “feminism” in foreign policy articulation within an FPE configuration that excludes reflexivity about the EU’s external relations vision and indeed, its practice.
KW - Feminist Foreign Policy
KW - gender
KW - peace and security
KW - women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168695602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2023.2233080
DO - 10.1080/09662839.2023.2233080
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168695602
SN - 0966-2839
VL - 32
SP - 485
EP - 507
JO - European Security
JF - European Security
IS - 3
ER -