Contextualisation of eLearning Systems in Higher Education Institutions

Gerald Gwamba, Jacobus Renken, Dianah Nampijja, Godfrey Mayende, Paul Birevu Muyinda

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

422 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The proliferation of digital technologies, and the emergence of global
lifelong learning has steered the transformation of education from the predominant classroom based learning to more flexible technology enhanced learning. However, realizing technology enhanced learning’s much anticipated benefits towards improving the educational potential of Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) in Developing Countries (DCs) is still a challenge because of the high information systems failure rate. Research suggests potentially substantial misalignment between DC HEIs’ E-Learning Management Systems (ELMS) and their
institutional contexts. To explore this gap, this research employs a qualitative approach based on a case study of the Makerere University Electronic Learning Environment (MUELE). We employ the Aparicio eLearning systems theoretical framework to explore the extent to which DC HEIs are aligning their ELMS within heir institutional contexts. Results indicate that, ELMS are not aligned to the context of DC HEIs implying that stringent measures need to be taken to close misalignment gaps.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning (IMCL2017)
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages327-338
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017

Publication series

NameAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
PublisherSpringer

Keywords

  • E-learning
  • Learning Management Systems
  • Higher education institutions
  • Developing Country Context

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contextualisation of eLearning Systems in Higher Education Institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this