Controlled clinical trials in cystic fibrosis--are we doing better?

Tracy Ann Briggs, Mandy Bryant, Rosalind L Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We have previously reported the time trends, design and interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in cystic fibrosis (CF) from 1961 through 1997 [Cheng K, Smyth RL, Motley J, O'Hea U, Ashby D, Randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis (1966-1997) categorized by time, design, and intervention. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000, 29:1-7.]. We maintain an ongoing register of all RCTs and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) in CF and have noted that in the five years since 1997 there has been a 48% increase in published trials. We aimed to assess whether this increase has been associated with an improvement in design quality. All RCTs and CCTs from 1961-2002 were assessed. Two epochs were then compared, 1961-1997 and 1998-2002. For each trial we recorded the design, participant numbers and the intervention studied. 261 trials in 1998-2002 were compared with 544 trials in 1961-1997. Comparing the two epochs a similar proportion of trials were parallel, double-blind and placebo controlled; also the median number of participants was similar. In the later epoch 25% of trials were multicentre, compared with 11% previously. Whilst this recent increase in clinical trials in CF is welcome, this has not been associated with improvements in quality. The trend for an increasing proportion of trials to be multicentre is encouraging. There are however, still deficiencies in the design of clinical trials in CF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cystic Fibrosis
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Keywords

  • Cystic Fibrosis/therapy
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/trends
  • Research Design/trends
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controlled clinical trials in cystic fibrosis--are we doing better?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this