Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive

Claire Noble, Elena Lieven, Faria Iqbal, Anna Theakston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    120 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In two studies we use a pointing task to explore developmentally the nature of the knowledge that underlies three- and four-year-old children's ability to assign meaning to the intransitive structure. The results suggest that early in development children are sensitive to a first-noun-as-causal-agent cue and animacy cues when interpreting conjoined agent intransitives. The same children, however, do not appear to rely exclusively on the number of nouns as a cue to structure meaning. The pattern of results indicates that children are processing a number of cues when inferring the meaning of the conjoined agent intransitive. These cues appear to be in competition with each other and the cue that receives the most activation is used to infer the meaning of the construction. Critically, these studies suggest that children's knowledge of syntactic structures forms a network of organization, such that knowledge of one structure can impact on interpretation of other structures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)811-842
    JournalJournal of Child Language
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    Early online date10 Jul 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

    Keywords

    • Argument structure
    • Conjoined agent intransitive
    • Language acquisition

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this