Cooperative Intuitionism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to pluralistic intuitionist theories, some of our moral beliefs are non-inferentially justified, and these beliefs come in both an a priori and an a posteriori variety. In this paper I present new support for this pluralistic form of intuitionism by examining the deeply social nature of moral inquiry. This is something that intuitionists have tended to neglect. It does play an important role in an intuitionist theory offered by Bengson, Cuneo, and Shafer-Landau (forth), but whilst they invoke the social nature of moral inquiry in order to argue that ordinary moral intuitions are trustworthy, my argument focuses on what I will call the ‘frontiers’ of moral inquiry. I will show that inclusive and cooperative dialogue is necessary at moral inquiry’s frontiers, and that intuitionists can expect such dialogue to result in both a priori and a posteriori moral beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Philosophical Quarterly
Early online date20 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cooperative Intuitionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this