Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non-audit services fees

Mahbub Zaman, Mohammed Hudaib, Roszaini Haniffa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

505 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper extends prior research on the relationship between governance quality and auditor remuneration. We examine the influence of audit committee effectiveness (ACE), a proxy for governance quality, on audit fees (AF) and non-audit services fees (NASF) using a new composite measure comprising audit committee independence, expertise, diligence and size. We find that after controlling for board of director characteristics, there is a significant positive association between ACE and AF only for larger clients. Our results indicate that effective audit committees undertake more monitoring which results in wider audit scope and higher audit fees. Contrary to our expectations, we find the association between ACE and NASF to be positive and significant, especially for larger clients. This suggests that larger clients are more likely to purchase non-audit services (NAS) even in the presence of effective audit committees probably due to the complexity of their activities. Overall, our findings support regulatory initiatives aimed at improving corporate governance quality. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-197
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Business Finance and Accounting
Volume38
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Audit Committees
  • Audit Fees
  • Audit Quality
  • Corporate Governance
  • Non-Executive Directors
  • Nonaudit Services

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non-audit services fees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this