Cortical circuits for silent speechreading in deaf and hearing people

Cheryl M. Capek, Mairéad MacSweeney, Bencie Woll, Dafydd Waters, Philip K. McGuire, Anthony S. David, Michael J. Brammer, Ruth Campbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This fMRI study explored the functional neural organisation of seen speech in congenitally deaf native signers and hearing non-signers. Both groups showed extensive activation in perisylvian regions for speechreading words compared to viewing the model at rest. In contrast to earlier findings, activation in left middle and posterior portions of superior temporal cortex, including regions within the lateral sulcus and the superior and middle temporal gyri, was greater for deaf than hearing participants. This activation pattern survived covarying for speechreading skill, which was better in deaf than hearing participants. Furthermore, correlational analysis showed that regions of activation related to speechreading skill varied with the hearing status of the observers. Deaf participants showed a positive correlation between speechreading skill and activation in the middle/posterior superior temporal cortex. In hearing participants, however, more posterior and inferior temporal activation (including fusiform and lingual gyri) was positively correlated with speechreading skill. Together, these findings indicate that activation in the left superior temporal regions for silent speechreading can be modulated by both hearing status and speechreading skill. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1233-1241
    Number of pages8
    JournalNEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
    Volume46
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • Brain
    • Deafness
    • fMRI
    • Language
    • Sign language
    • Speechreading

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cortical circuits for silent speechreading in deaf and hearing people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this