Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery

  • Tina Lavender
  • , Carol Kingdon
  • , Anna Hart
  • , Gill Gyte
  • , Mark Gabbay
  • , James P. Neilson

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)490-491
    Number of pages1
    JournalBmj
    Volume331
    Issue number7515
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2005

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Attitude of Health Personnel
    • Attitude to Health
    • Cesarean Section
    • Consultants
    • England
    • Female
    • Humans
    • Male
    • psychology: Medical Staff, Hospital
    • Midwifery
    • psychology: Nurse Midwives
    • Obstetrics
    • Pregnancy
    • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    • Surgical Procedures, Elective

    Cite this