Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Credibility and authenticity in qualitative accounting research

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Producing ‘good’ qualitative research requires mastering a range of not-so-obvious tasks,
from the identification of an interesting research question (cf. Sandberg and Alvesson, 2011)
to an appealing write-up that meets the expectations of the target audience (cf. Golden-Biddle
and Locke, 2007). In this chapter, we focus on two challenges that researchers encounter at
some point along this journey. These are (1) the challenge to ensure, and communicate, the
integrity of one’s findings, and (2) the challenge to write up the data in a way that does justice
to the qualitative nature of the research. We refer to these issues as concerns with credibility
and authenticity, respectively. The purpose of the chapter is to revisit different strategies for
producing credible and authentic accounts and to illustrate the application of such strategies
in the area of accounting research. Our intention is not to provide an ultimate ‘checklist’ as
this may ‘function to the detriment of thoughtful or innovative research practice’ (Barbour,
2014, p. 498). Rather, the goal is to sensitize the reader, by way of example, to the importance
of acknowledging credibility and authenticity as key building blocks of good qualitative
research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods
PublisherRoutledge
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Credibility and authenticity in qualitative accounting research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this