Crowdsourcing Subjective Perceptions of Neighbourhood Disorder: Interpreting Bias in Open Data

Reka Solymosi, Kate Bowers, Taku Fujiyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

New forms of data are now widely used in social sciences, and much debate surrounds their ideal application to the study of crime problems. Limitations associated with this data, including the subjective bias in reporting are often a point of this debate. In this article, we argue that by re-conceptualizing such data and focusing on their mode of production of crowdsourcing, this bias can be understood as a reflection of people’s subjective experiences with their environments. To illustrate, we apply the theoretical framework of signal crimes to empirical analysis of crowdsourced data from an online problem reporting website. We show how this approach facilitates new insight into people’s experiences and discuss implications for advancing research on perception of crime and place.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)944-967
Number of pages24
JournalThe British Journal of Criminology
Volume58
Issue number4
Early online date7 Sept 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Crowd-sourcing
  • crime
  • fear of crime
  • signal crimes
  • Open source
  • crowdsourcing
  • open data
  • disorder
  • environment
  • routine activities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Crowdsourcing Subjective Perceptions of Neighbourhood Disorder: Interpreting Bias in Open Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this