TY - JOUR
T1 - Current clinical opinion on surgical approaches and rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon injury-a questionnaire study
AU - Xue, Ruikang
AU - Wong, Jason
AU - Imere, Angela
AU - King, Heather
AU - Clegg, Peter
AU - Cartmell, Sarah
N1 - © 2024 Xue, Wong, Imere, King, Clegg and Cartmell.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The management of flexor tendon injury has seen many iterations over the years, but more substantial innovations in practice have been sadly lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of flexor tendon injury management, and variation in practice from the previous reports, most troublesome complications, and whether there was a clinical interest in potential innovative tendon repair technologies. An online survey was distributed via the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and a total of 132 responses were collected anonymously. Results showed that although most surgeons followed the current medical recommendation based on the literature, a significant number of surgeons still employed more conventional treatments in clinic, such as general anesthesia, ineffective tendon retrieval techniques, and passive rehabilitation. Complications including adhesion formation and re-rupture remained persistent. The interest in new approaches such as use of minimally invasive instruments, biodegradable materials and additive manufactured devices was not strong, however the surgeons were potentially open to more effective and economic solutions.
AB - The management of flexor tendon injury has seen many iterations over the years, but more substantial innovations in practice have been sadly lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of flexor tendon injury management, and variation in practice from the previous reports, most troublesome complications, and whether there was a clinical interest in potential innovative tendon repair technologies. An online survey was distributed via the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and a total of 132 responses were collected anonymously. Results showed that although most surgeons followed the current medical recommendation based on the literature, a significant number of surgeons still employed more conventional treatments in clinic, such as general anesthesia, ineffective tendon retrieval techniques, and passive rehabilitation. Complications including adhesion formation and re-rupture remained persistent. The interest in new approaches such as use of minimally invasive instruments, biodegradable materials and additive manufactured devices was not strong, however the surgeons were potentially open to more effective and economic solutions.
U2 - 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1269861
DO - 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1269861
M3 - Article
C2 - 38425421
SN - 2673-3129
VL - 6
SP - 1269861
JO - Frontiers in Medical Technology
JF - Frontiers in Medical Technology
ER -