Cyclically adjusted provisions and financial stability

Pierre Richard Agénor, Luiz Pereira da Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

188 Downloads (Pure)


This paper studies the extent to which alternative loan loss provisioning regimes affect the procyclicality of the financial system and financial volatility. It uses a DSGE model with financial frictions (namely, collateral effects and economies of scope in banking) and a generic formulation of provisioning regimes. Numerical experiments with a parameterized version of the model show that cyclically adjusted (or, more commonly called, dynamic) provisioning can be highly effective in terms of mitigating procyclicality and financial risks, measured in terms of the volatility of the credit-output ratio and real house prices, in response to financial shocks. The optimal combination of simple cyclically adjusted provisioning and countercyclical reserve requirement rules is also studied. The simultaneous use of these instruments does not improve the ability of either one of them to mitigate financial volatility, making them (partial) substitutes rather than complements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-162
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Early online date17 Jan 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017


  • DSGE models
  • Provisioning regimes
  • Reserve requirements


Dive into the research topics of 'Cyclically adjusted provisions and financial stability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this