Abstract
This paper presents a review of current evidence and ideas relating to the digital gig economy (DGE): contingent (task- or project-based) intangible work delivered digitally and done for money, organised via online outsourcing platforms that are marketplaces bringing together buyers and sellers. Examples of such platforms include Freelancer, Upwork, Amazon Mechanical Turk and Zhubajie/Witmart.
While the paper takes a particular interest in the perspective of workers in developing countries, most of its findings will apply globally, and many will apply to the broader gig / sharing / platform economy.
This document aims to be comprehensive and so readers are directed to particular items of interest, posed in terms of question:
What are the key definitions and terminology: see Box 1
How big and how fast-growing is the DGE sector: see start of Section B
What are the positive impacts of DGE work: see Section B1
What are the negative impacts and problems of DGE work: see Section B2
Why intervene to improve the digital gig economy: see Section B3
What decent work standards should be applied to improve the digital gig economy: see Section C1
How should decent work standards be applied for DGE improvement: see Section C2
Can existing codes and standards be used in the digital gig economy: see Section C2iii
What stakeholder-specific motivations and barriers will shape application of decent work standards: see Section C2iv
What should be the next steps in terms of action and research: see Section D
Other questions addressed include:
What are the problems with the current evidence base: see Box 2
How can DGE problems and solutions be represented graphically: see Box 3
What should be the aim of DGE intervention: see Section C2i
Should decent work standards apply broader or narrower than just the digital gig economy: see Section C2ii
What do individual items of literature have to say about problems, recommendations, proposals and codes for the digital gig economy: see Appendices
While the paper takes a particular interest in the perspective of workers in developing countries, most of its findings will apply globally, and many will apply to the broader gig / sharing / platform economy.
This document aims to be comprehensive and so readers are directed to particular items of interest, posed in terms of question:
What are the key definitions and terminology: see Box 1
How big and how fast-growing is the DGE sector: see start of Section B
What are the positive impacts of DGE work: see Section B1
What are the negative impacts and problems of DGE work: see Section B2
Why intervene to improve the digital gig economy: see Section B3
What decent work standards should be applied to improve the digital gig economy: see Section C1
How should decent work standards be applied for DGE improvement: see Section C2
Can existing codes and standards be used in the digital gig economy: see Section C2iii
What stakeholder-specific motivations and barriers will shape application of decent work standards: see Section C2iv
What should be the next steps in terms of action and research: see Section D
Other questions addressed include:
What are the problems with the current evidence base: see Box 2
How can DGE problems and solutions be represented graphically: see Box 3
What should be the aim of DGE intervention: see Section C2i
Should decent work standards apply broader or narrower than just the digital gig economy: see Section C2ii
What do individual items of literature have to say about problems, recommendations, proposals and codes for the digital gig economy: see Appendices
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Manchester |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | GDI Development Informatics Working Papers |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Centre for Development Informatics |
| Volume | 71 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Global Development Institute
