Decision making by Austin, Texas, residents in hypothetical tornado scenarios

David M. Schultz, Eve C. Gruntfest, Mary H. Hayden, Charles C. Benight, Sheldon Drobot, Lindsey R. Barnes

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    One of the goals of the Warning Project is to understand how people receive warnings of hazardous weather and subsequently use this information to make decisions. As part of the project, 519 surveys from Austin, Texas, floodplain residents were collected and analyzed. About 90% of respondents understood that a tornado warning represented a more serious and more likely threat than a tornado watch. Most respondents (86%) were not concerned about a limited number of false alarms or close calls reducing their confidence in future warnings, suggesting no cry-wolf effect. Most respondents reported safe decisions in two hypothetical scenarios: a tornado warning issued while the respondent was home and a tornado visible by the respondent while driving. However, nearly half the respondents indicated that they would seek shelter from a tornado under a highway overpass if they were driving. Despite the limitations of this study, these results suggest that more education is needed on the dangers of highway overpasses as shelter from severe weather. © 2010 American Meteorological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWeather, Climate, and Society|Weather Clim. Soc.
    PublisherNational Center for Atmospheric Research
    Pages249-254
    Number of pages5
    Volume2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Decision making by Austin, Texas, residents in hypothetical tornado scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this