Abstract
We studied dual-channel supply chains using centralized and decentralized decision-making models. We also conducted a comparative analysis of the decisions before and after demand disruption. The study shows that the amount of change in decision-making is a linear function of the amount of demand disruption, and it is independent of the risk-averse coefficient. The optimal sales volume decision of the disturbing supply chain is related to market share and demand disruption in the decentralized decision-making model. The optimal decision is only influenced by demand disruption in the centralized decision-making model. The stability of the sales volume of the two models is related to market share and demand disruption. The optimal system production of the two models shows robustness, but their stable internals are different.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 206-224 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation |
| Volume | 55 |
| Early online date | 8 Jul 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2018 |
Keywords
- Demand disruption
- risk-averse
- dual-channel
- Stackelberg game