Abstract
This paper shows that, identifying individuals with their utility functions, - v‴(x)/v″(x) ≤ -u‴(x)/u″(x) for all x implies that individual v's optimal choice of self-protection expenditure is larger than individual u's, provided that marginal increases in self-protection expenditure from u's optimal choice are mean-preserving. The result clarifies the relationship between self-protection and downside risk aversion and underscores the interpretation of - u‴(x)/u″(x) as a measure of the strength of u's downside risk aversion relative to his own risk aversion because a mean-preserving increase in self-protection expenditure is shown to effect a special combination of a downside risk increase and a mean-preserving contraction. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-101 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Feb 2005 |
Keywords
- Downside risk-aversion
- Prudence measure
- Risk-aversion
- Self-protection