Abstract
Political polarization is one of the most discussed challenges facing contemporary democracies and is often associated with a broader epistemic crisis. While inspiring a large literature in political science, polarization's epistemic problems also have significance for normative democratic theory, and this study develops a new approach aimed at understanding them. In contrast to prominent accounts from political psychology - group polarization theory and cultural cognition theory - which argue that polarization leads individuals to form unreliable political beliefs, this study focuses on system-level diversity. It argues that polarization's epistemic harms are best located in its tendency to reduce the diversity of perspectives utilized in a democratic system and in how this weakens the system's ability to identify and address problems of public concern. Understanding such harms is also argued to require a greater consideration of the political dynamics of polarization and issues of elite discourse, alongside political psychology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1719-1732 |
Journal | American Political Science Review |
Volume | 118 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 3 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |