Dependency tree matching with extended Tree edit distance with subtrees for textual entailment

Maytham Alabbas, Allan Ramsay

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    A lot of natural language processing (NLP) applications require the computation of similarities between pairs of syntactic or semantic trees. Tree edit distance (TED), in this context, is considered to be one of the most effective techniques. However, its main drawback is that it deals with single node operations only. We therefore extended TED to deal with subtree transformation operations as well as single nodes. This makes the extended TED with subtree operations more effective and flexible than the standard TED, especially for applications that pay attention to relations among nodes (e.g. in linguistic trees, deleting a modifier subtree should be cheaper than the sum of deleting its components individually). The preliminary results of extended TED with subtree operations were encouraging compared with the standard one when tested on different examples of dependency trees. © 2012 Polish Info Processing Socit.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2012 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2012|Fed. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., FedCSIS
    PublisherPolish Information Processing Society
    Pages11-18
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)9781467307086
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    Event2012 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2012 - Wroclaw
    Duration: 1 Jul 2012 → …
    http://fedcsis.org/proceedings/fedcsis2012/#H4AAIA

    Conference

    Conference2012 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2012
    CityWroclaw
    Period1/07/12 → …
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • textual entailment
    • tree edit distance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dependency tree matching with extended Tree edit distance with subtrees for textual entailment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this