TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection and quantification of exhaled volatile organic compounds in mechanically ventilated patients
T2 - comparison of two sampling methods
AU - Oort, Pouline M. P. van
AU - White, Iain R.
AU - Ahmed, Waqar
AU - Johnson, Craig
AU - Bannard-Smith, Jonathan
AU - Felton, Timothy
AU - Bos, Lieuwe D.
AU - Goodacre, Royston
AU - Dark, Paul
AU - Fowler, Stephen J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the NIHR, award number II-LA-0214-20009, and supported by the NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility. IW, PMD, TF and SJF are supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. We would like to acknowledge the support from Salford Royal Hospital and their Critical Care for the use of the ventilator circuit equipment and decommissioning and regular servicing, as well as the support of the translational Clinical Science laboratories.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2021/1/7
Y1 - 2021/1/7
N2 - Exhaled breath analysis is a promising new diagnostic tool, but currently no standardised method for sampling is available in mechanically ventilated patients. We compared two breath sampling methods, first using an artificial ventilator circuit, then in "real life"in mechanically ventilated patients on the intensive care unit. In the laboratory circuit, a 24-component synthetic-breath volatile organic compound (VOC) mixture was injected into the system as air was sampled: (A) through a port on the exhalation limb of the circuit and (B) through a closed endo-bronchial suction catheter. Sorbent tubes were used to collect samples for analysis by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Realistic mechanical ventilation rates and breath pressure-volume loops were established and method detection limits (MDLs) were calculated for all VOCs. Higher yields of VOCs were retrieved using the closed suction catheter; however, for several VOCs MDLs were compromised due to the background signal associated with plastic and rubber components in the catheters. Different brands of suction catheter were compared. Exhaled VOC data from 40 patient samples collected at two sites were then used to calculate the proportion of data analysed above the MDL. The relative performance of the two methods differed depending on the VOC under study and both methods showed sensitivity towards different exhaled VOCs. Furthermore, method performance differed depending on recruitment site, as the centres were equipped with different brands of respiratory equipment, an important consideration for the design of multicentre studies investigating exhaled VOCs in mechanically ventilated patients.
AB - Exhaled breath analysis is a promising new diagnostic tool, but currently no standardised method for sampling is available in mechanically ventilated patients. We compared two breath sampling methods, first using an artificial ventilator circuit, then in "real life"in mechanically ventilated patients on the intensive care unit. In the laboratory circuit, a 24-component synthetic-breath volatile organic compound (VOC) mixture was injected into the system as air was sampled: (A) through a port on the exhalation limb of the circuit and (B) through a closed endo-bronchial suction catheter. Sorbent tubes were used to collect samples for analysis by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Realistic mechanical ventilation rates and breath pressure-volume loops were established and method detection limits (MDLs) were calculated for all VOCs. Higher yields of VOCs were retrieved using the closed suction catheter; however, for several VOCs MDLs were compromised due to the background signal associated with plastic and rubber components in the catheters. Different brands of suction catheter were compared. Exhaled VOC data from 40 patient samples collected at two sites were then used to calculate the proportion of data analysed above the MDL. The relative performance of the two methods differed depending on the VOC under study and both methods showed sensitivity towards different exhaled VOCs. Furthermore, method performance differed depending on recruitment site, as the centres were equipped with different brands of respiratory equipment, an important consideration for the design of multicentre studies investigating exhaled VOCs in mechanically ventilated patients.
UR - http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/33103170
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099216369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AN01134J
U2 - 10.1039/C9AN01134J
DO - 10.1039/C9AN01134J
M3 - Article
C2 - 33103170
SN - 0003-2654
VL - 146
SP - 222
EP - 231
JO - The Analyst
JF - The Analyst
IS - 1
ER -