Abstract
The common practice of using inhibition efficiency (η%) to determine the standard
Gibbs energy of adsorption ( ΔGºads) for a corrosion inhibitor in acidic solution is
evaluated. It is demonstrated that the typical assumption that η% is a good proxy for fractional surface coverage (θ) is not necessarily valid. Consequently, the accuracy of the ΔGºads value obtained from such data is doubtful. Moreover, it is argued that even a more direct measurement of q may still not allow one to extract an accurate estimate of ΔGºads.
Gibbs energy of adsorption ( ΔGºads) for a corrosion inhibitor in acidic solution is
evaluated. It is demonstrated that the typical assumption that η% is a good proxy for fractional surface coverage (θ) is not necessarily valid. Consequently, the accuracy of the ΔGºads value obtained from such data is doubtful. Moreover, it is argued that even a more direct measurement of q may still not allow one to extract an accurate estimate of ΔGºads.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Corrosion Science |
Early online date | 4 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Acid solutions (A)
- XPS (B)
- Acid inhibition (C)
- Interfaces (C)