Developing the FARSEEING Taxonomy of Technologies: Classification and Description of Technology Use (including ICT) in Falls Prevention Studies

Elisabeth Boulton, Helen Hawley-Hague, Beatrix Vereijken, Amanda Clifford, Nick Guldemond, Klaus Pfeiffer, Alex Hall, Federico Chesani, Sabato Mellone, Alan Bourke, Chris Todd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    BACKGROUND: Recent Cochrane reviews on falls and fall prevention have shown that it is possible to prevent falls in older adults living in the community and in care facilities. Technologies aimed at fall detection, assessment, prediction and prevention are emerging, yet there has been no consistency in describing or reporting on interventions using technologies. With the growth of eHealth and data driven interventions, a common language and classification is required.

    OBJECTIVE: The FARSEEING Taxonomy of Technologies was developed as a tool for those in the field of biomedical informatics to classify and characterise components of studies and interventions.

    METHODS: The Taxonomy Development Group (TDG) comprised experts from across Europe. Through face-to-face meetings and contributions via email, five domains were developed, modified and agreed: Approach; Base; Components of outcome measures; Descriptors of technologies; and Evaluation. Each domain included sub-domains and categories with accompanying definitions. The classification system was tested against published papers and further amendments undertaken, including development of an online tool. Six papers were classified by the TDG with levels of consensus recorded.

    RESULTS: Testing the taxonomy with papers highlighted difficulties in definitions across international healthcare systems, together with differences of TDG members' backgrounds. Definitions were clarified and amended accordingly, but some difficulties remained. The taxonomy and manual were large documents leading to a lengthy classification process. The development of the online application enabled a much simpler classification process, as categories and definitions appeared only when relevant. Overall consensus for the classified papers was 70.66%. Consensus scores increased as modifications were made to the taxonomy.

    CONCLUSION: The FARSEEING Taxonomy of Technologies presents a common language, which should now be adopted in the field of biomedical informatics. In developing the taxonomy as an online tool, it has become possible to continue to develop and modify the classification system to incorporate new technologies and interventions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)132-140
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2016


    Dive into the research topics of 'Developing the FARSEEING Taxonomy of Technologies: Classification and Description of Technology Use (including ICT) in Falls Prevention Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this