Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and testing of new candidate psoriatic arthritis screening questionnaires combining optimal questions from existing tools

  • Laura C. Coates
  • , Jessica Walsh
  • , Muhammad Haroon
  • , Oliver Fitzgerald
  • , Tariq Aslam
  • , Farida Al Balushi
  • , A. D. Burden
  • , Esther Burden-Teh
  • , Anna R. Caperon
  • , Rino Cerio
  • , Chandrabhusan Chattopadhyay
  • , Hector Chinoy
  • , Mark J D Goodfield
  • , Lesley Kay
  • , Stephen Kelly
  • , Bruce W. Kirkham
  • , Christopher R. Lovell
  • , Helena Marzo-Ortega
  • , Neil McHugh
  • , Ruth Murphy
  • Nick J. Reynolds, Catherine H. Smith, Elizabeth J C Stewart, Richard B. Warren, Robin Waxman, Hilary E. Wilson, Philip S. Helliwell

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    Objective. Several questionnaires have been developed to screen for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but head-to-head studies have found limitations. This study aimed to develop new questionnaires encompassing the most discriminative questions from existing instruments. Methods. Data from the CONTEST study, a head-to-head comparison of 3 existing questionnaires, were used to identify items with a Youden index score of ≥0.1. These were combined using 4 approaches: CONTEST (simple additions of questions), CONTESTw (weighting using logistic regression), CONTESTjt (addition of a joint manikin), and CONTESTtree (additional questions identified by classification and regression tree [CART] analysis). These candidate questionnaires were tested in independent data sets. Results. Twelve individual questions with a Youden index score of ≥0.1 were identified, but 4 of these were excluded due to duplication and redundancy. Weighting for 2 of these questions was included in CONTESTw. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that involvement in 6 joint areas on the manikin was predictive of PsA for inclusion in CONTESTjt. CART analysis identified a further 5 questions for inclusion in CONTESTtree. CONTESTtree was not significant on ROC curve analysis and discarded. The other 3 questionnaires were significant in all data sets, although CONTESTw was slightly inferior to the others in the validation data sets. Potential cut points for referral were also discussed. Conclusion. Of 4 candidate questionnaires combining existing discriminatory items to identify PsA in people with psoriasis, 3 were found to be significant on ROC curve analysis. Testing in independent data sets identified 2 questionnaires (CONTEST and CONTESTjt) that should be pursued for further prospective testing. Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1410-1416
    Number of pages6
    JournalArthritis Care & Research
    Volume66
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development and testing of new candidate psoriatic arthritis screening questionnaires combining optimal questions from existing tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this