Development of a relationship between olfactory response and major odorants from organic wastes

P. J. Hobbs, T. H. Misselbrook, M. S. Dhanoa, K. C. Persaud

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Determination of an averaged human olfactory response as odour concentration to odours by instrumental means has been sought to simplify on-site measurement and reduce cost. Different concentrations of hydrogen sulphide, 4-methyl phenol, ammonia and acetic acid were used to simulate livestock waste odour. A second-order uniform precision rotatable central composite statistical design identified 31 odour mixtures to establish a human olfactory response model. An odour panel containing eight people was selected according to recognised criteria. They had an average age of 43.3 years. A multiple linear regression model accounted for 74.1% of the variance, with a decreasing order of influence of hydrogen sulphide>4-methyl phenol≫acetic acid within the bounds of the model described. Surprisingly, 4-methyl phenol concentration produced a negative effect on the olfactory response. To enable better fitting of the complex olfactory response radial basis function, neural network modelling was used to account for 88% of the variance. With pig manure odours outside the studied concentration range the network model did not function. Predictions using the linear regression model were on average 20% less than observed values. These findings demonstrate that this approach is appropriate to determine the odour concentration from pig manure using the main odorants. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)188-193
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
    Volume81
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • Instrumentation
    • Modelling
    • Neural network
    • Odour mixtures
    • Odours
    • Olfactometry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a relationship between olfactory response and major odorants from organic wastes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this