TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the critical success decision criteria for an equitable order sharing in an extended enterprise
AU - Taifa, Ismail
AU - Hayes, Steve
AU - Stalker, Iain
N1 - Funding Information:
We hereby acknowledge for all the funding from the UK Government through the provision of the Commonwealth Scholarship [TZCS-2017-720].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/12
Y1 - 2020/3/12
N2 - Purpose: This study identifies and ranks the appropriate critical success decision criteria (CSDC) for the bulk order distribution (sharing) amongst multiple manufacturers (suppliers) working as an extended enterprise (EE). Design/methodology/approach: The study deploys a qualitative approach to generate the appropriate decision criteria. The balanced scorecard and Pareto's chart (using Minitab
® version 18) were used for gathering and analysing the pertinent criteria. Findings: The process of evaluating and selecting the right manufacturers is essential. Manufacturer (supplier) selection is no longer decided solely based on cost/price criterion; currently, the quality and delivery criteria prevail. Additional incorporated criteria include price/cost, technical capability, production facilities and capacity, customer satisfaction and impression, geographical location, management and organisation, financial position, environmental concern, performance history, repair service, information technology and communication systems, procedural compliance, labour relation record, reputation, flexibility or diversification, attitude, operating controls, business desire, packaging ability, past business records, trust and loyalty, training aids, complaint handling service, warranties and claim policies, reciprocal arrangements, research and development and innovation, modern slavery concern, sustainable capability, collaborative/partnership and responsiveness. The study proposed a conceptual framework of an EE alongside how manufacturers working as a single virtual entity can consider the supply chain operations reference (SCOR
®) model. Research limitations/implications: The identified CSDC are suitable for order allocation to domestic manufacturers. The deployed approaches could be extended to the mixed and quantitative approaches for increasing the generalisability. Originality/value: The study establishes the pertinent CSDC that are important to execute equitable order distribution to manufacturers in an EE framework.
AB - Purpose: This study identifies and ranks the appropriate critical success decision criteria (CSDC) for the bulk order distribution (sharing) amongst multiple manufacturers (suppliers) working as an extended enterprise (EE). Design/methodology/approach: The study deploys a qualitative approach to generate the appropriate decision criteria. The balanced scorecard and Pareto's chart (using Minitab
® version 18) were used for gathering and analysing the pertinent criteria. Findings: The process of evaluating and selecting the right manufacturers is essential. Manufacturer (supplier) selection is no longer decided solely based on cost/price criterion; currently, the quality and delivery criteria prevail. Additional incorporated criteria include price/cost, technical capability, production facilities and capacity, customer satisfaction and impression, geographical location, management and organisation, financial position, environmental concern, performance history, repair service, information technology and communication systems, procedural compliance, labour relation record, reputation, flexibility or diversification, attitude, operating controls, business desire, packaging ability, past business records, trust and loyalty, training aids, complaint handling service, warranties and claim policies, reciprocal arrangements, research and development and innovation, modern slavery concern, sustainable capability, collaborative/partnership and responsiveness. The study proposed a conceptual framework of an EE alongside how manufacturers working as a single virtual entity can consider the supply chain operations reference (SCOR
®) model. Research limitations/implications: The identified CSDC are suitable for order allocation to domestic manufacturers. The deployed approaches could be extended to the mixed and quantitative approaches for increasing the generalisability. Originality/value: The study establishes the pertinent CSDC that are important to execute equitable order distribution to manufacturers in an EE framework.
KW - Balanced scorecard
KW - Buyer-supplier relationships
KW - Decision-making
KW - Extended enterprise
KW - Small to medium-sized enterprise
KW - Supply chain operations reference model
U2 - 10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0138
DO - 10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0138
M3 - Article
SN - 1754-2731
VL - 32
SP - 1715
EP - 1742
JO - The TQM Journal
JF - The TQM Journal
IS - 6
ER -