Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: A multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves

C. P. Klingenberg, S. Duttke, S. Whelan, M. Kim

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The structure of compound leaves provides flexibility for morphological change by variation in the shapes, sizes and arrangement of leaflets. Here, we conduct a multilevel analysis of shape variation in compound leaves to explore the developmental plasticity and evolutionary potential that are the basis of diversification in leaf shape. We use the methods of geometric morphometrics to study the shapes of individual leaflets and whole leaves in 20 taxa of Potentilla (sensu lato). A newly developed test based on the bootstrap approach suggests that uncertainty in the molecular phylogeny precludes firm conclusions whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the data on leaf shape. For variation among taxa, variation within taxa, as well as fluctuating asymmetry, there is evidence of strong morphological integration. The patterns of variation are similar across all three levels, suggesting that integration within taxa may act as a constraint on evolutionary change. © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2011 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)115-129
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

    Keywords

    • Allometry
    • Compound leaf
    • Fluctuating asymmetry
    • Geometric morphometrics
    • Leaf shape
    • Phylogenetic uncertainty
    • Plasticity
    • Principal component analysis
    • Procrustes fit
    • Rosaceae

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: A multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this