TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
T2 - a consensus survey
AU - Optimise HFpEF Investigators
AU - Austin, Rosalynn
AU - Khair, Eva
AU - Blakeman, Thomas
AU - Hossain, Muhammad Zakir
AU - Sowden, Emma
AU - Chew-Graham, Carolyn
AU - Forsyth, Faye
AU - Deaton, Christi
AU - Chakravorty, Mollika
AU - Maclachlan, Sophie
AU - Kane, Edward
AU - Odone, Jessica
AU - Thorley, Natasha
AU - Borja-Boluda, Susana
AU - Wellwood, Ian
AU - Hossain, Muhammed
AU - Sharpley, John
AU - Gordon, Brain
AU - Taffe, Joanna
AU - Long, Aaron
AU - Aziz, Affan
AU - Swayze, Hannah
AU - Rutter, Heather
AU - Schramm, Chris
AU - MacDonald, Sine
AU - Papworth, Helena
AU - Smith, Julie
AU - Needs, Craig
AU - Cronk, David
AU - Newark, Chris
AU - Blake, Duncan
AU - Brown, Alistair
AU - Basuita, Amman
AU - Gayton, Emma
AU - Glover, Victoria
AU - Fox, Robin
AU - Crawshaw, Jonathan
AU - Ashdown, Helen
AU - A'Court, Christine
AU - Ayerst, Rachael
AU - Hernandez-Diaz, Basilio
AU - Knox, Kyle
AU - Wooding, Nick
AU - Wanninayake, Shamila
AU - Keast, Christopher
AU - Jones, Adam
AU - Brown, Katherine
AU - Gaw, Matthew
AU - Thomas, Nick
AU - Dixon, Sharon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2024/12/20
Y1 - 2024/12/20
N2 - Aim As heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) prevalence increases, it remains frequently underdiagnosed and poorly managed. Recent positive pharmacological trials have increased interest in HFpEF but challenges of diagnosis and management remain. The survey aim was to examine consensus between primary and secondary care providers regarding HFpEF diagnosis and management. Methods As part of a larger programme of work, survey questions were developed in an online format and piloted with healthcare providers (HCPs). The survey link was distributed via professional networks and social media. Analysis included frequencies of responses, comparison by main professional groups and thematic analysis free-text responses. A virtual workshop of HCPs was conducted to discuss and refine survey findings. Results HCPs (n=66) across the UK participated: 19 general practitioners (GPs), 20 HF specialist nurses (HFSN), 17 cardiologists and 10 others. Consensus was high (92%) that diagnosing the type of HF was very important and most favoured inclusion of HFpEF in Quality Outcome Framework indicators. No clear consensus was reached that ongoing management should be in primary care (47.5% of GPs, 35% of HFSN and 31.3% of cardiologists 'somewhat agreed'). Opinions differed between GPs (52.3)% and specialists (HFSN 80% and cardiologists 81.3%) for practice nurses to be upskilled and assume HFpEF management. No HCPs reported any level of disagreement for HFSN management of HFpEF. Free-text comments highlighted resource barriers to HFpEF diagnosis and management and confirmed the need to develop better HFpEF services. Conclusions Consensus was reached regarding importance of diagnosing HFpEF, but agreement on methods and responsibilities for diagnosis and management varied. Free-text comments identified HCPs concerns related to overwhelmed primary and secondary care services and lack of sufficient resources to meet existing patient demands. Creation of collaborative care pathways is needed to support the increasing number of older patients with HFpEF.
AB - Aim As heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) prevalence increases, it remains frequently underdiagnosed and poorly managed. Recent positive pharmacological trials have increased interest in HFpEF but challenges of diagnosis and management remain. The survey aim was to examine consensus between primary and secondary care providers regarding HFpEF diagnosis and management. Methods As part of a larger programme of work, survey questions were developed in an online format and piloted with healthcare providers (HCPs). The survey link was distributed via professional networks and social media. Analysis included frequencies of responses, comparison by main professional groups and thematic analysis free-text responses. A virtual workshop of HCPs was conducted to discuss and refine survey findings. Results HCPs (n=66) across the UK participated: 19 general practitioners (GPs), 20 HF specialist nurses (HFSN), 17 cardiologists and 10 others. Consensus was high (92%) that diagnosing the type of HF was very important and most favoured inclusion of HFpEF in Quality Outcome Framework indicators. No clear consensus was reached that ongoing management should be in primary care (47.5% of GPs, 35% of HFSN and 31.3% of cardiologists 'somewhat agreed'). Opinions differed between GPs (52.3)% and specialists (HFSN 80% and cardiologists 81.3%) for practice nurses to be upskilled and assume HFpEF management. No HCPs reported any level of disagreement for HFSN management of HFpEF. Free-text comments highlighted resource barriers to HFpEF diagnosis and management and confirmed the need to develop better HFpEF services. Conclusions Consensus was reached regarding importance of diagnosing HFpEF, but agreement on methods and responsibilities for diagnosis and management varied. Free-text comments identified HCPs concerns related to overwhelmed primary and secondary care services and lack of sufficient resources to meet existing patient demands. Creation of collaborative care pathways is needed to support the increasing number of older patients with HFpEF.
KW - Health Services
KW - Heart failure
KW - Primary Care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214120176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092993
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092993
M3 - Article
C2 - 39806710
AN - SCOPUS:85214120176
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 14
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 12
M1 - e092993
ER -