Diagnosis of an additional in situ melanoma does not influence survival for patients with a single invasive melanoma: A registry-based follow-up study

Danny R Youlden; Kiarash Khosrotehrani; Adèle C Green; H Peter Soyer; Michael G Kimlin; Philippa H Youl; Joanne F Aitken; Peter D Baade

doi:10.1111/ajd.12429

Diagnosis of an additional in situ melanoma does not influence survival for patients with a single invasive melanoma: A registry-based follow-up study

Danny R Youlden, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Adèle C Green, H Peter Soyer, Michael G Kimlin, Philippa H Youl, Joanne F Aitken, Peter D Baade

Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences (L5)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

171 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using a large (N= 25 493) population-based cohort from Queensland, Australia, we compared melanoma survival among cases with a single invasive melanoma only against those who also had a diagnosis of a single in situ melanoma. After adjustment for sex, age, body site, clinicopathological subtype, thickness and ulceration, it was found that there was no difference (P = 0.99) in 10-year melanoma-specific mortality following a diagnosis of an invasive lesion, whether or not an in situ melanoma was also present. We conclude that in situ melanomas do not alter the prognosis of an invasive melanoma.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	57-60
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Australasian journal of dermatology
Volume	57
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12429
Publication status	Published - Feb 2016

Keywords

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Melanoma
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasms, Second Primary
Queensland
Registries
Skin Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Young Adult
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/ajd.12429

In situ melanoma_survival for patients invasive mel_title page _submitted to AJD (revised)Accepted author manuscript, 126 KB

Cite this

@article{9263f97afd2c45e38b6a7ab7306e5947,

title = "Diagnosis of an additional in situ melanoma does not influence survival for patients with a single invasive melanoma: A registry-based follow-up study",

abstract = "Using a large (N= 25 493) population-based cohort from Queensland, Australia, we compared melanoma survival among cases with a single invasive melanoma only against those who also had a diagnosis of a single in situ melanoma. After adjustment for sex, age, body site, clinicopathological subtype, thickness and ulceration, it was found that there was no difference (P = 0.99) in 10-year melanoma-specific mortality following a diagnosis of an invasive lesion, whether or not an in situ melanoma was also present. We conclude that in situ melanomas do not alter the prognosis of an invasive melanoma.",

keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Queensland, Registries, Skin Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Young Adult, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",

author = "Youlden, {Danny R} and Kiarash Khosrotehrani and Green, {Ad{\`e}le C} and Soyer, {H Peter} and Kimlin, {Michael G} and Youl, {Philippa H} and Aitken, {Joanne F} and Baade, {Peter D}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/ajd.12429",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "57--60",

journal = "The Australasian journal of dermatology",

issn = "1440-0960",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of an additional in situ melanoma does not influence survival for patients with a single invasive melanoma

T2 - A registry-based follow-up study

AU - Youlden, Danny R

AU - Khosrotehrani, Kiarash

AU - Green, Adèle C

AU - Soyer, H Peter

AU - Kimlin, Michael G

AU - Youl, Philippa H

AU - Aitken, Joanne F

AU - Baade, Peter D

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Using a large (N= 25 493) population-based cohort from Queensland, Australia, we compared melanoma survival among cases with a single invasive melanoma only against those who also had a diagnosis of a single in situ melanoma. After adjustment for sex, age, body site, clinicopathological subtype, thickness and ulceration, it was found that there was no difference (P = 0.99) in 10-year melanoma-specific mortality following a diagnosis of an invasive lesion, whether or not an in situ melanoma was also present. We conclude that in situ melanomas do not alter the prognosis of an invasive melanoma.

AB - Using a large (N= 25 493) population-based cohort from Queensland, Australia, we compared melanoma survival among cases with a single invasive melanoma only against those who also had a diagnosis of a single in situ melanoma. After adjustment for sex, age, body site, clinicopathological subtype, thickness and ulceration, it was found that there was no difference (P = 0.99) in 10-year melanoma-specific mortality following a diagnosis of an invasive lesion, whether or not an in situ melanoma was also present. We conclude that in situ melanomas do not alter the prognosis of an invasive melanoma.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Melanoma

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Invasiveness

KW - Neoplasms, Second Primary

KW - Queensland

KW - Registries

KW - Skin Neoplasms

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1111/ajd.12429

DO - 10.1111/ajd.12429

M3 - Article

C2 - 26776229

SN - 1440-0960

VL - 57

SP - 57

EP - 60

JO - The Australasian journal of dermatology

JF - The Australasian journal of dermatology

IS - 1

ER -

Diagnosis of an additional in situ melanoma does not influence survival for patients with a single invasive melanoma: A registry-based follow-up study

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this