Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation

Abdullah Pandor; Daniel Horner; Sarah Davis; Steve Goodacre; John W Stevens; Mark Clowes; Beverley J Hunt; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit

doi:10.3310/hta23630

Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation

Abdullah Pandor
, Daniel Horner
, Sarah Davis
, Steve Goodacre
, John W Stevens
, Mark Clowes
, Beverley J Hunt
, Tim Nokes
, Jonathan Keenan
, Kerstin de Wit

Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Abstract
Background
Thromboprophylaxis can reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during lower-limb immobilisation, but it is unclear whether or not this translates into meaningful health benefit, justifies the risk of bleeding or is cost-effective. Risk assessment models (RAMs) could select higher-risk individuals for thromboprophylaxis.

Original language	Undefined
Journal	Health Technology Assessment
Volume	23
Issue number	63
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23630
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.3310/hta23630

Cite this

@article{eb468279c7184cdba9c46b9958f86028,

title = "Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation",

abstract = "Abstract Background Thromboprophylaxis can reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during lower-limb immobilisation, but it is unclear whether or not this translates into meaningful health benefit, justifies the risk of bleeding or is cost-effective. Risk assessment models (RAMs) could select higher-risk individuals for thromboprophylaxis.",

author = "Abdullah Pandor and Daniel Horner and Sarah Davis and Steve Goodacre and Stevens, \{John W\} and Mark Clowes and Hunt, \{Beverley J\} and Tim Nokes and Jonathan Keenan and Wit, \{Kerstin de\}",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3310/hta23630",

language = "Undefined",

volume = "23",

journal = "Health Technology Assessment",

issn = "1366-5278",

publisher = "NIHR Journals Library",

number = "63",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation

AU - Pandor, Abdullah

AU - Horner, Daniel

AU - Davis, Sarah

AU - Goodacre, Steve

AU - Stevens, John W

AU - Clowes, Mark

AU - Hunt, Beverley J

AU - Nokes, Tim

AU - Keenan, Jonathan

AU - Wit, Kerstin de

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Abstract Background Thromboprophylaxis can reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during lower-limb immobilisation, but it is unclear whether or not this translates into meaningful health benefit, justifies the risk of bleeding or is cost-effective. Risk assessment models (RAMs) could select higher-risk individuals for thromboprophylaxis.

AB - Abstract Background Thromboprophylaxis can reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during lower-limb immobilisation, but it is unclear whether or not this translates into meaningful health benefit, justifies the risk of bleeding or is cost-effective. Risk assessment models (RAMs) could select higher-risk individuals for thromboprophylaxis.

UR - https://doi.org/10.3310/hta23630

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081188452

U2 - 10.3310/hta23630

DO - 10.3310/hta23630

M3 - Article

SN - 1366-5278

VL - 23

JO - Health Technology Assessment

JF - Health Technology Assessment

IS - 63

ER -

Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this