TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential innate immune responses of a living skin equivalent model colonized by staphylococcus epidermidis or staphylococcus aureus
AU - Holland, Diana B.
AU - Bojar, Richard A.
AU - Farrar, Mark D.
AU - Holland, Keith T.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Staphylococcus epidermidis is a commensal on skin, whereas Staphylococcus aureus is a transient pathogen. The aim was to determine whether the skin's innate defence systems responded differently to these microorganisms. Differential gene expression of a human skin equivalent (SE) model was assessed by microarray technology, in response to colonization by S. epidermidis or S. aureus. Only a small number of transcripts were significantly (P2-fold on SEs colonized with S. epidermidis compared with controls (no colonization). Expression of one innate defence gene, pentraxin 3 (PTX3), was upregulated, while psoriasin, S100A12, S100A15, β defensin 4, β defensin 3, lipocalin 2 and peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 were downregulated. In contrast, large numbers of transcripts were significantly increased (480) or decreased (397) with gene expression changes of >2-fold on SEs colonized with S. aureus compared with controls. There was upregulation in gene expression of many skin defence factors including Toll-like receptor 2, β defensin 4, properdin, PTX3, proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-17C, IL-20, IL-23A and chemokines IL-8, CCL4, CCL5, CCL20 and CCL27. These differences may partly explain why S. epidermidis is a normal skin resident and S. aureus is not. © 2008 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Staphylococcus epidermidis is a commensal on skin, whereas Staphylococcus aureus is a transient pathogen. The aim was to determine whether the skin's innate defence systems responded differently to these microorganisms. Differential gene expression of a human skin equivalent (SE) model was assessed by microarray technology, in response to colonization by S. epidermidis or S. aureus. Only a small number of transcripts were significantly (P2-fold on SEs colonized with S. epidermidis compared with controls (no colonization). Expression of one innate defence gene, pentraxin 3 (PTX3), was upregulated, while psoriasin, S100A12, S100A15, β defensin 4, β defensin 3, lipocalin 2 and peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 were downregulated. In contrast, large numbers of transcripts were significantly increased (480) or decreased (397) with gene expression changes of >2-fold on SEs colonized with S. aureus compared with controls. There was upregulation in gene expression of many skin defence factors including Toll-like receptor 2, β defensin 4, properdin, PTX3, proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-17C, IL-20, IL-23A and chemokines IL-8, CCL4, CCL5, CCL20 and CCL27. These differences may partly explain why S. epidermidis is a normal skin resident and S. aureus is not. © 2008 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Innate immunity
KW - Microarray
KW - Skin equivalent model
KW - Staphylococcus aureus
KW - Staphylococcus epidermidis
U2 - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01402.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01402.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19054079
VL - 290
SP - 149
EP - 155
JO - FEMS microbiology letters
JF - FEMS microbiology letters
SN - 0378-1097
IS - 2
ER -