Dimethylfumarate: Potency prediction and clinical experience

David A. Basketter, Ian R. White, Florence G. Burleson, Gary R. Burleson, Ian Kimber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background. Dimethylfumarate (DMF) was the cause of a major outbreak of allergic contact dermatitis as a consequence of its use as an antifungal agent in leather products, particularly in furniture, with what became known as 'toxic sofa dermatitis'. Objectives. To determine whether the frequency and severity of reactions to DMF arose as a function of its intrinsic potency and/or the nature and extent of exposure. Methods. The intrinsic potency of DMF was measured with the standard local lymph node assay (LLNA), with determination of an EC3 value, which is the threshold in the LLNA and serves as an indicator of relative skin-sensitizing potency in humans. Results. The EC3 value for DMF was 0.35% when tested in dimethylformamide as a vehicle, indicating that DMF is a strong, but not an extreme, skin sensitizer in this mouse model. Conclusions. DMF appears to have a sensitizing potency in the mouse that is very similar to that of formaldehyde, which is also a strong human skin sensitizer. However, the frequency and intensity of allergic contact dermatitis reactions to DMF suggest that it was the prolonged, repeated and occlusive exposure to this chemical over large skin areas, combined with the strong sensitizing potency, that generated the 'perfect storm' conditions that caused the DMF epidemic. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)269-272
    Number of pages3
    JournalContact dermatitis
    Volume68
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2013

    Keywords

    • dimethylfumarate
    • globally harmonized system
    • local lymph node assay
    • potency categorization
    • risk assessment
    • skin sensitization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dimethylfumarate: Potency prediction and clinical experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this