Abstract
We examine disagreement between management and Thomson Datastream over the persistence of earnings components. Using income statement and footnote disclosures, we identify the source and properties of disputed items. Disagreements typically reflect opaque reporting practices (for example, in the case of transitory operating items) and restrictive classification rules (for example, in the case of discontinued operations). Incremental and relative value relevance tests suggest that the majority of management-specific adjustments reflect appropriate classification of earnings components by insiders. Nevertheless, evidence consistent with strategic disclosure does emerge for a subset of management adjustments. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 595-622 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Review of Accounting Studies |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2007 |
Keywords
- Disagreement
- Non-GAAP earnings
- Transitory items