Distinguishing differences in construct from differences in response style: gsem for Item Response Theory models with Anchoring Vignettes

Andrew Pickles, Matthew Bluett-Duncan, Helen Sharp, Silia Vitoratou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Item response theory models allow estimation of participant and group-mean trait scores from responses to a set of items, but estimates can be biased when participants vary in their response style. We illustrate models fit in gsem that can account for such response style differences by comparing self-report with their ratings of anchoring vignettes—descriptions of other individuals displaying different levels of the trait. Simulation results from standard item response theory, mean bias, random bias, and free-threshold models are illustrated. We show that unbiased estimates can be recovered when the vignettes rated depend on the participants’ own self-rating or are even rated by a different sample, substantially broadening their scope of application.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)666-686
JournalThe Stata Journal
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • st0760
  • gsem
  • item response theory
  • IRT
  • anchoring vignettes
  • response bias
  • cross-culture calibration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinguishing differences in construct from differences in response style: gsem for Item Response Theory models with Anchoring Vignettes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this