Do U.S. insurance firms offer the "wrong" incentives to their executives?

Andreas Milidonis, Konstantinos Stathopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine the relation between executive compensation and market-implied default risk for listed insurance firms from 1992 to 2007. Shareholders are expected to encourage managerial risk sharing through equity-based incentive compensation. We find that long-term incentives and other share-based plans do not affect the default risk faced by firms. However, the extensive use of stock options leads to higher future default risk for insurance firms. We argue that this is because option-based incentives induce managerial risk-taking behavior, which seeks to maximize managerial payoff through equity volatility. This could be detrimental to the interests of shareholders, especially during a financial crisis. © The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2011.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)643-672
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Risk and Insurance
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do U.S. insurance firms offer the "wrong" incentives to their executives?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this