Doctors, Patients, and Nudging in the Clinical Context-Four Views on Nudging and Informed Consent.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In an analysis of recent work on nudging we distinguish three positions on the relationship between nudging founded in libertarian paternalism and the protection of personal autonomy through informed consent. We argue that all three positions fail to provide adequate protection of personal autonomy in the clinical context. Acknowledging that nudging may be beneficial, we suggest a fourth position according to which nudging and informed consent are valuable in different domains of interaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-38
JournalThe American journal of bioethics
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • clinical context
  • informed consent
  • libertarian paternalism
  • nudging
  • personal autonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Doctors, Patients, and Nudging in the Clinical Context-Four Views on Nudging and Informed Consent.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this