Does bigger mean better? British perspectives on American cancer treatment and research, 1948

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In the summer of 1948, a delegation representing the British Empire Cancer Campaign (BECC) toured North American cancer treatment and research facilities, and reported their observations back to their organization's executive board. This historical article contextualizes the British delegation's observations of US treatment and research, and discusses what the delegation made of the United States' new, "bigger" approaches to cancer surgery and chemotherapeutic research. I argue that the BECC delegation used their observations of US practice to reinforce a positive sense of British distinctiveness, thus reassuring themselves and their colleagues that Britain could still be a leader in the increasingly international field we now call oncology. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5831-5834
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
    Volume25
    Issue number36
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does bigger mean better? British perspectives on American cancer treatment and research, 1948'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this