TY - JOUR
T1 - Does bigger mean better? British perspectives on American cancer treatment and research, 1948
AU - Toon, Elizabeth
PY - 2007/12/20
Y1 - 2007/12/20
N2 - In the summer of 1948, a delegation representing the British Empire Cancer Campaign (BECC) toured North American cancer treatment and research facilities, and reported their observations back to their organization's executive board. This historical article contextualizes the British delegation's observations of US treatment and research, and discusses what the delegation made of the United States' new, "bigger" approaches to cancer surgery and chemotherapeutic research. I argue that the BECC delegation used their observations of US practice to reinforce a positive sense of British distinctiveness, thus reassuring themselves and their colleagues that Britain could still be a leader in the increasingly international field we now call oncology. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
AB - In the summer of 1948, a delegation representing the British Empire Cancer Campaign (BECC) toured North American cancer treatment and research facilities, and reported their observations back to their organization's executive board. This historical article contextualizes the British delegation's observations of US treatment and research, and discusses what the delegation made of the United States' new, "bigger" approaches to cancer surgery and chemotherapeutic research. I argue that the BECC delegation used their observations of US practice to reinforce a positive sense of British distinctiveness, thus reassuring themselves and their colleagues that Britain could still be a leader in the increasingly international field we now call oncology. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/37649006831
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2448
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2448
M3 - Article
SN - 1527-7755
VL - 25
SP - 5831
EP - 5834
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 36
ER -