Does laparoscopic surgery offer adequate clearance in rectal cancer?--A discussion

S Purkayastha, O Aziz, T Athanasiou, P Paraskevas, A Darzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Currently in the UK, the national institute of clinical excellence (NICE), only advocates laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer as part of commissioned clinical trials. Laparoscopic teaching, training and techniques have evolved greatly and offer many benefits to patients, whilst remaining technically demanding to surgeons still on the slope of the learning curve. Can such minimally invasive techniques be used with the same results as open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer? Are laparoscopic colorectal surgeons able to achieve the same clearance of tumours and so avoid recurrence at the same rate compared to conventional techniques? The discussion to follow, aims to shed some light on such questions and briefly review some of the literature. If laparoscopic anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections achieve the same results as open procedures, then should these techniques be more widely taught and practised? Surely the peri-operative cost of these laparoscopic procedures does not over shadow the potential outcome from much less traumatic surgery?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-6
Number of pages4
JournalInternational journal of surgery (London, England)
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does laparoscopic surgery offer adequate clearance in rectal cancer?--A discussion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this