Does real time experience matter?: Comparison of retrospective and in situ spatial data in participatory mapping

Lucia Brisudová; Jonny Huck; Reka Solymosi

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6411541

Does real time experience matter? Comparison of retrospective and in situ spatial data in participatory mapping

Lucia Brisudová, Jonny Huck, Reka Solymosi

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal whether and how retrospective and in situ data collected in the process of Participatory GIS differ. This well suited technique serves for mapping the spatial aspects of an individual’s perception, and can be carried out from previous experiences (retrospectively), or directly as people go about their routine activities (in situ). The current study compares maps of people’s perceptions of urban space in Olomouc city, Czech Republic and in Manchester, UK using both approaches. Evaluating how conclusions differ between these approaches contributes to better understanding and interpretation of geospatial participatory data in future.

Original language	English
Pages	1-6
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411541
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2022
Event	30th Annual Geographical Information Science Research UK - Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 5 Apr 2022 → 8 Apr 2022

Conference

Conference	30th Annual Geographical Information Science Research UK
Abbreviated title	GISRUK
Country/Territory	United Kingdom
City	Liverpool
Period	5/04/22 → 8/04/22

Keywords

participatory GIS
perception
urban space
Map-Me
CIN CITY

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5281/zenodo.6411541

GISRUK_2022_paper_63Final published version, 1.3 MB

Cite this

@conference{7eb0a0950b7b4f49b4f10c8ac5d92b65,

title = "Does real time experience matter?: Comparison of retrospective and in situ spatial data in participatory mapping",

abstract = "The aim of this study is to reveal whether and how retrospective and in situ data collected in the process of Participatory GIS differ. This well suited technique serves for mapping the spatial aspects of an individual{\textquoteright}s perception, and can be carried out from previous experiences (retrospectively), or directly as people go about their routine activities (in situ). The current study compares maps of people{\textquoteright}s perceptions of urban space in Olomouc city, Czech Republic and in Manchester, UK using both approaches. Evaluating how conclusions differ between these approaches contributes to better understanding and interpretation of geospatial participatory data in future.",

keywords = "participatory GIS, perception, urban space, Map-Me, CIN CITY",

author = "Lucia Brisudov{\'a} and Jonny Huck and Reka Solymosi",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.5281/zenodo.6411541",

language = "English",

pages = "1--6",

note = "30th Annual Geographical Information Science Research UK, GISRUK ; Conference date: 05-04-2022 Through 08-04-2022",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Does real time experience matter?

T2 - 30th Annual Geographical Information Science Research UK

AU - Brisudová, Lucia

AU - Huck, Jonny

AU - Solymosi, Reka

PY - 2022/4/1

Y1 - 2022/4/1

N2 - The aim of this study is to reveal whether and how retrospective and in situ data collected in the process of Participatory GIS differ. This well suited technique serves for mapping the spatial aspects of an individual’s perception, and can be carried out from previous experiences (retrospectively), or directly as people go about their routine activities (in situ). The current study compares maps of people’s perceptions of urban space in Olomouc city, Czech Republic and in Manchester, UK using both approaches. Evaluating how conclusions differ between these approaches contributes to better understanding and interpretation of geospatial participatory data in future.

AB - The aim of this study is to reveal whether and how retrospective and in situ data collected in the process of Participatory GIS differ. This well suited technique serves for mapping the spatial aspects of an individual’s perception, and can be carried out from previous experiences (retrospectively), or directly as people go about their routine activities (in situ). The current study compares maps of people’s perceptions of urban space in Olomouc city, Czech Republic and in Manchester, UK using both approaches. Evaluating how conclusions differ between these approaches contributes to better understanding and interpretation of geospatial participatory data in future.

KW - participatory GIS

KW - perception

KW - urban space

KW - Map-Me

KW - CIN CITY

U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.6411541

DO - 10.5281/zenodo.6411541

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 6

Y2 - 5 April 2022 through 8 April 2022

ER -