Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study

Charlotte Sharp; Caroline Sanders; William Dixon; Ruth Boaden

doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9

Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study

Charlotte Sharp, Caroline Sanders, William Dixon, Ruth Boaden

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Getting knowledge from healthcare research into practice (knowledge mobilisation) remains a global challenge. One way in which researchers may attempt to do this is to develop products (such as toolkits, actionable tools, dashboards, guidance, audit tools, protocols and clinical decision aids) in addition to journal papers. Despite their increasing ubiquity, the development of such products remains under-explored in the academic literature. This study aimed to further this understanding by exploring the development of products from healthcare research and how the process of their development might influence their potential application.

Original language	English
Article number	132
Pages (from-to)	132
Journal	Implementation science communications
Volume	3
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9
Publication status	Published - Jan 2022

Keywords

Applied healthcare research
Dissemination
Implementation
Knowledge mobilisation
Products
Qualitative
Toolkits

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9

Cite this

@article{8bed5796763847e6a049588efa63a878,

title = "Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study",

abstract = "Getting knowledge from healthcare research into practice (knowledge mobilisation) remains a global challenge. One way in which researchers may attempt to do this is to develop products (such as toolkits, actionable tools, dashboards, guidance, audit tools, protocols and clinical decision aids) in addition to journal papers. Despite their increasing ubiquity, the development of such products remains under-explored in the academic literature. This study aimed to further this understanding by exploring the development of products from healthcare research and how the process of their development might influence their potential application.",

keywords = "Applied healthcare research, Dissemination, Implementation, Knowledge mobilisation, Products, Qualitative, Toolkits",

author = "Charlotte Sharp and Caroline Sanders and William Dixon and Ruth Boaden",

note = "Funding Information: This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "132",

journal = "Implementation science communications",

issn = "2662-2211",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study

AU - Sharp, Charlotte

AU - Sanders, Caroline

AU - Dixon, William

AU - Boaden, Ruth

N1 - Funding Information: This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - Getting knowledge from healthcare research into practice (knowledge mobilisation) remains a global challenge. One way in which researchers may attempt to do this is to develop products (such as toolkits, actionable tools, dashboards, guidance, audit tools, protocols and clinical decision aids) in addition to journal papers. Despite their increasing ubiquity, the development of such products remains under-explored in the academic literature. This study aimed to further this understanding by exploring the development of products from healthcare research and how the process of their development might influence their potential application.

AB - Getting knowledge from healthcare research into practice (knowledge mobilisation) remains a global challenge. One way in which researchers may attempt to do this is to develop products (such as toolkits, actionable tools, dashboards, guidance, audit tools, protocols and clinical decision aids) in addition to journal papers. Despite their increasing ubiquity, the development of such products remains under-explored in the academic literature. This study aimed to further this understanding by exploring the development of products from healthcare research and how the process of their development might influence their potential application.

KW - Applied healthcare research

KW - Dissemination

KW - Implementation

KW - Knowledge mobilisation

KW - Products

KW - Qualitative

KW - Toolkits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165306819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9

DO - 10.1186/s43058-022-00360-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 36517868

SN - 2662-2211

VL - 3

SP - 132

JO - Implementation science communications

JF - Implementation science communications

IS - 1

M1 - 132

ER -

Does the process of developing products for knowledge mobilisation from healthcare research influence their uptake? A comparative case study

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this